Family Integrated Church (FIC)
Online Discussions of the FIC
(Links to several discussions of the FIC including Karen Campbell’s discussion of the pros and cons of the FIC.)
Confusion Regarding the Multiple Facets of the FIC
Southern Seminary Guilty by Association or a Case of the Emperor’s New Clothes? (Examination of the overlapping beliefs shared among the wide array of groups that advocate the FIC)
(Sarah Palin and issues with evangelism in the FIC)
(Noting the use of identical language within many different camps and parachurch organziations under the FIC umbrella and the honest confusion that results. Noting the different groups within the Southern Baptist Convention, Vision Forum, Henry Reyenga’s Home Discipleship and Voddie Baucham.)
(Examining more overlapping beliefs within different factions of the FIC, comparing statements made by Randy Stinson of SBTS and by Doug Phillips of Vision Forum)
Southern Baptist Convention’s Specific Views About the FIC
Steve Wright’s “reThink”
(The SBC’s version of the
Randy Stinson
- *Part I: Vision Forum Commonalities
- *Part II: Rejection of the Church as a Family of Families
- *Part III: No Rejection of Age Appropriate Education
Development of FIC Doctrine
Benjamin M Palmer’s Ontological Subordination of Women: “The Derivative Image of God”
(Quoting Palmer on the role of women in family from his 1876 book, “The Family”)
(Additional quotes from the 1876 publication)
(Additional quotes from Palmer)
College and the Family Integrated Church
College Attendance For Daughters, Post 1(A review of Voddie Baucham’s statements about the necessity of college for daughters in comparison to his family’s choices.)
(
Voddie Baucham on the Family Integrated Church
(Southern Baptist Convention Minister and Vision Forum Affiliate)
(Southern Baptist Convention Minister and Vision Forum Affiliate)
(Noting that though Baucham claims to reject certain practices and find them repulsive yet continues to participate in close relationships with groups that embrace these practices and ideologies that support them.)
(Formal questions posed to Dr. Baucham after he agreed via email to answer questions regarding perceived discontinuity between his embracing of the FIC and claims about his personal convictions.)
(Transcript of an embedded audio)
(Discussion of how manipulative religious groups maintain two sets of beliefs and rules, including those that are not written and are reinforced subjectively.)
Corresponding with Voddie Baucham
Corresponding with Voddie Baucham Via Email: Discerning the Intent
(Discussion of an ambiguous apology offered as damage control for an untrue statement posted on Baucham’s blog including a comment from Don Veinot)
(Discerning genuine apologies from “blanket apologies” that offer no shows of contrition or attempts to make restitution.)
(Baucham’s post contains an error regarding the interest in an apologetics conference presentation on the topic of patriarchy) followed by a Second Statement About the Veracity of Baucham’s Original Blog Post